Posts | 8,580 |
Member Since | 26 Jan 2009 |
Last Visit | 23 Dec 2016 |
Likes Given | 7,087 |
Likes Received | 4,679/2,614 |
Posts | 8,580 |
Member Since | 26 Jan 2009 |
Last Visit | 23 Dec 2016 |
Likes Given | 7,087 |
Likes Received | 4,679/2,614 |
Posts | 8,580 |
Member Since | 26 Jan 2009 |
Last Visit | 23 Dec 2016 |
Likes Given | 7,087 |
Likes Received | 4,679/2,614 |
Posts | 8,580 |
Member Since | 26 Jan 2009 |
Last Visit | 23 Dec 2016 |
Likes Given | 7,087 |
Likes Received | 4,679/2,614 |
oberder wrote: Head's up -- Tech News
Believe it or not, Microsoft will be laying down IE -- IE 11 will be the last version that will be on the Windows system, but for those who have Win7/8/8-1 will need to update to this or lose any security patches. Details of the news can be seen at the ZDNet Tech Blog:
Reference source -- Millions of Internet Explorer users must update, or lose patches | ZDNet
Posts | 5,881 |
Member Since | 10 Sep 2010 |
Last Visit | 16 Apr 2024 |
Likes Given | 2,500 |
Likes Received | 5,791/2,534 |
Quote:I wonder who uses IE
Posts | 2,841 |
Member Since | 1 Aug 2010 |
Last Visit | 28 Nov 2023 |
Likes Given | 10 |
Likes Received | 2,968/1,514 |
Posts | 8,580 |
Member Since | 26 Jan 2009 |
Last Visit | 23 Dec 2016 |
Likes Given | 7,087 |
Likes Received | 4,679/2,614 |
adinkle wrote: in re: to Adobe Flash---that has been a real pain on Chromium- with no way to fix. I get emails frequently re: crashes. Glad I am not an Owner or Admin. as it continues to be a problem no matter who tackles it ---even Googles fixes don't work.
OK Back to the Grid & surveys just in case I find one that has a bit of cash.
Posts | 8,580 |
Member Since | 26 Jan 2009 |
Last Visit | 23 Dec 2016 |
Likes Given | 7,087 |
Likes Received | 4,679/2,614 |
Posts | 8,580 |
Member Since | 26 Jan 2009 |
Last Visit | 23 Dec 2016 |
Likes Given | 7,087 |
Likes Received | 4,679/2,614 |
Posts | 8,580 |
Member Since | 26 Jan 2009 |
Last Visit | 23 Dec 2016 |
Likes Given | 7,087 |
Likes Received | 4,679/2,614 |
Quote:GTK3 integration (GNU/Linux only)
Posts | 2,841 |
Member Since | 1 Aug 2010 |
Last Visit | 28 Nov 2023 |
Likes Given | 10 |
Likes Received | 2,968/1,514 |
Posts | 8,580 |
Member Since | 26 Jan 2009 |
Last Visit | 23 Dec 2016 |
Likes Given | 7,087 |
Likes Received | 4,679/2,614 |
Posts | 8,580 |
Member Since | 26 Jan 2009 |
Last Visit | 23 Dec 2016 |
Likes Given | 7,087 |
Likes Received | 4,679/2,614 |
Posts | 5,881 |
Member Since | 10 Sep 2010 |
Last Visit | 16 Apr 2024 |
Likes Given | 2,500 |
Likes Received | 5,791/2,534 |
ptcscrutiny wrote: Looks like Conduit toolbars are not compatible with Firefox 43 (atleast for now).
My old toolbar has been disabled and when I tried to remove it and reinstall it, I get a message :
The add-on downloaded from this site could not be installed because it appears to be corrupt.
Posts | 8,580 |
Member Since | 26 Jan 2009 |
Last Visit | 23 Dec 2016 |
Likes Given | 7,087 |
Likes Received | 4,679/2,614 |
Posts | 8,580 |
Member Since | 26 Jan 2009 |
Last Visit | 23 Dec 2016 |
Likes Given | 7,087 |
Likes Received | 4,679/2,614 |
oberder wrote: Hope this Firefox tweak ( About:Config ) can help: xpinstall.signatures.required -- the default value is TRUE, change that to FALSE so you can still use the add-ons without worries of signature verification
That is, until v44 where the tweak will be removed ( if that happens, the best bet is to using the Nightly or ESR variants )
EDIT: I just had to find the article regarding this tweak
Reference source -- What you do when Firefox disables installed add-ons - gHacks Tech News
Posts | 5,881 |
Member Since | 10 Sep 2010 |
Last Visit | 16 Apr 2024 |
Likes Given | 2,500 |
Likes Received | 5,791/2,534 |
Posts | 8,580 |
Member Since | 26 Jan 2009 |
Last Visit | 23 Dec 2016 |
Likes Given | 7,087 |
Likes Received | 4,679/2,614 |
Posts | 2,841 |
Member Since | 1 Aug 2010 |
Last Visit | 28 Nov 2023 |
Likes Given | 10 |
Likes Received | 2,968/1,514 |