ptcscrutiny wrote: So all other sites which pay a little less should simply stop to offer them, right?
I didn’t say anything like that and therefore your question makes no sense I think. Any site is free to do anything as long as it’s not illegal.
On the other hand, the workers who do the tasks is only reasonable to select the channel that will pay them more for the same effort and for the tasks this is not clixsense and this is a fact that can be easily proved.
Since all the channels get the same amount from CrowdFlower, clixsense decided to offer less money for the same work than others and this does look like a strategy to reduce the potential income of the workers / members. Isn't it
ptcscrutiny wrote: ClixSense pays referral commissions for Sticky, Micro & Mini ads, while many sites don't for such ads.
On the other hand, there are sites that offer up to $0.01 per click per direct referral while the maximum you can get here is $0.004.
And there are sites that offer higher referral commissions for the offers and tasks and sites that also offer several things with a high value that the referrals can purchase and this way the referrer can get many times a higher benefit for the purchase commissions than a place where usually someone -of the few ones who will purchase something- will get a membership for $17.
ptcscrutiny wrote: ClixSense pays the most for the SSI and surveys from many other panels. What do you have to say about that?
I have to say that many times you can find a different place to do the same survey for a higher payment.
ptcscrutiny wrote: You won't bring these positive aspects into the argument, instead only focus on the Tasks pay rate.
There are always two sides of a coin.
I only pointed out that his arguments can actually be valid ones and about the tasks is a fact that his argument was valid. About the other one he mentioned as I said it’s easy for someone of the staff to take a look at his account and let us know
ptcscrutiny wrote: So that means it was a "strategy" by ClixSense to make sure that only his earnings are reduced.
This is what he feels. Can you change his opinion or explain why his earnings were reduced as he said?
Can you explain why clixsense pay less than others for the same tasks
ptcscrutiny wrote: Introduction of sticky ads simply does not prove a reduction in earnings. What if his referrals activity gradually declined which is the case with nearly everyone?
You say that it’s a coincidence but on the other hand, the timing is a bit strange. Right?
ptcscrutiny wrote: You need a regular stream of referrals because many will loose interest in the program. Go check the Top Sponsors list and you will find that their "active" referrals usually reduce with time unless they keep bringing in new members.
And how do I know if he has a regular stream?
As I said the timing is a bit strange to make someone think that it's only a coincidence.
By the way if a regular stream of referrals is needed this means that there are related expenses as well to maintain that stream and therefore only a part of the referral earnings most of the times will be profit for the upline.
Quote:I removed the names because if hadn't done so, this topic would have become a _______ vs ClixSense topic. Do you want to see such a thread again, which then has to be locked abruptly?
I would like to see freedom of speech. Removing a name that actually proves something and asking for proofs at the same time doesn’t make sense