#4 by BouldRake » Sat May 02, 2015 10:29
I live by the moors. I care about ecology, conservation, hill walking, cardigans and flat caps. My ambition in life is to own a field and live in it (really - I'll even be running an ad here at Clixsense for it shortly). What do I have in common with a banker in London who cares about cars, gadgets, television programs and ISAs, who desires a penthouse suite at the Savoy?
How is it even possible to please both people with the same government? You can't.
And of course it dilutes power. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. The more of it you give to somebody, the more they'll stab you in the back with it. We don't want any individual with power, we want lots of people with equality.
The Scottish problem is that "Scotland" isn't a sensible division (and to be honest, neither is Yorkshire). It's way too big - it's not obvious someone in Glasgow has anything in common with someone in the remote highlands.
In the case of Yorkshire, the Vikings got it mostly right - the wapentakes still make up sensible divisions. In the rest of the UK, parliamentary constituencies need some work, but offer a reasonable start.
In fact, the Lib-Dems mostly offer this with their support for more devolution to local councils - it's just watered down a bit compared to what I would like.