Kod mene dva kodinga za pocetak dana ukupno 40+ stepova,inace ni jedan do kraja ali sasvim ok.

Samo nek nastave danas tako necu da se zalim

Odlican pocetak dana nakon dugo vremena, već 15 komada odrađenih od toga 7-8 kodinga te već nekih 10$ od rf-a

koding ide ko lud a nakon dugo vermena da dobijem jedan od 98 koraka...mozda krene vise nabolje

Knjizara puta 2 oba server internal error....hvala bogu

Job Abandoned. Knjizara i simulator. Nema sanse da zapocnem zadatak. Doduse nije mi ni zao

Nakon solidnog početka sada opet pustoš. Nikad na zelenu granu.

U sred rada mi ode u Abandoned od 30+ koraka

Sad sam imao borbu sa kuhinjom. Radio sam 20 koraka preko 2o minuta.

Pop-up rule change 2016-12-14 13:48:27 UTC, Kristen Hohenstein
Hello dear testers! We’re changing our rules regarding pop-ups.
In the past, we told you to report any pop-up a test author did not mention in the instructions, including pop-ups not produced from the customer website itself (e.g. pop-ups related to browser updates, network issues, browsers saving your password, etc).
We originally decided on this solution with the intention to disable all pop-ups not produced from a customer’s website itself. Unfortunately, this has been very hard to keep up. Every browser update presents new pop-ups we need to disable and we often don’t learn about them until after customer results have been affected. This results in testers being forced to fail an otherwise passable test due to a random popup the customer likely doesn’t care about. This is not useful for our customers, is incredibly frustrating for our testers, and not a good use of developer time.
Moving forward, you only need to report a pop-up if it is a pop-up produced by the customer’s website that the test author didn’t warn you about. Do NOT report pop-ups that are related to browsers, networks, hardware etc. Here are a couple examples of the distinction we’re drawing:
- If you log into a customer’s website and you get a pop up asking if you want Chrome to save your password, do NOT report this.
- If you are testing for Best Company Ever and encounter a pop-up asking, “Do you want to subscribe to weekly email updates from Best Company Ever?”, but the test author never mentioned encountering this pop-up in the instructions, you need to report it.
I hope this solution makes testing with Rainforest a better experience for both our testers and our customers. Do NOT stress about nitpicking over this in the future — discernment and common sense should hopefully be enough to determine whether a pop-up is directly produced by a customer’s website or by something else, like a browser setting or network update. If we see this solution isn’t working and there’s still a lot of confusion, we will readjust as needed. Moving forward, please only submit support tickets or create forum topics about this if it is a pop-up that’s truly confusing. I’ll be updating the forum and confusing scenarios wiki page with this information, and will also try to make tutorial videos with examples to supplement this announcement in the future. It's important to note that you still need to report error messages you receive. So if you encounter an error message in pop-up format, you need to report this.
I also want to emphasize a point that’s not a rule change, but something I’ve said before: If a test author instructs you at the beginning of the test to close any pop-ups you might encounter and continue testing, this counts as them mentioning any pop-up you might encounter. Do NOT report pop-ups you encounter after a test author says this.
Thank you for hanging in there with us and understanding that we’re always trying to improve our processes even if we don’t get it right the first time. We sincerely appreciate everything you do for us. Happy testing ❤

Dobio electricity od 45 stepova i poslali mi job disagriment.

Trebao sam u gmail inboxu da pretrazim mail po imenu i prezimenu i nije ga bilo.. ali ga vidim da je tu, samo sa email adresom za koju sam poslao invite.
I udarim YES i prodje sve lepo do kraja.

Sada sam objasnio da sam mail video i tako to... da li se ova moja glupost moze kasnije nesto kao negativno reflektovati u daljem radu? Oni kazu da ovo nije rejection, nego learning oportunity...

Ne trebas da brines.

Inace i sam dobijem JD gde sam u pravu dok ostala 2 kontributora recimo prijave da imaju error a sve je lepo na screenshotu pokazano da nemam nikakav problem ali eto mora da se dobije JD zbog te dvojice.

Zato lepo objasnis tamo o cemu se radi i nema problema. To jest trebali bi da uvaze ako je sve lepo dokazano i vidljivo kroz SS.

Da li vi mozete da vidite retrospektivu. Ja kad pokusam kaze da stranica ne postoji

jesam li propustila neko obavestenje u vezi toga ?

"click through any / all links and buttons"

Šta radite kad u instrukcijama piše ovo? Šta misli ovaj koji je pravio ovaj test, da ću za 4 centa ceo sajt da mu proverim?

sinoć kuhinja 6 koraka, i danas još dva po sedam. Ostalo - ako bude šta i blizu toga, ide prijava na maksimalno drugom koraku. Jedva dolar kad se sabere

Darkko365 wrote: "click through any / all links and buttons"

Šta radite kad u instrukcijama piše ovo? Šta misli ovaj koji je pravio ovaj test, da ću za 4 centa ceo sajt da mu proverim?

Koliko ja tu vidim pitanje je da se klikne bilo koji ILI svaki link i dugme pretpostavljam do odredjenog cilja koji se trazi. Ako je ta / postavljena tu.


Inace i kod mene za razliku od juce jako slab dan tek 3 hita

svi ovi Safari mi odose u napuistene zbog toga sto nece da mi otvori pretrazivac

Retrospektiva je izgleda ukinuta.

Nole76 wrote: Retrospektiva je izgleda ukinuta.

Da, bilo je price o tome na rf forumu, pocelo je zloupotrebljavanje opcije jer ispocetka uopste nisu zeljeli da se gleda retrospektiva svakog nego samo onih za koje dobijes "job disagreement". Zloupotreba je nastala tako da je svako ziv poceo prijavljivati na njihovom forumu gdje god ugleda da je neko napravio gresku te su se sami testeri poceli igrati moderatora/admina sto skroz nije fer i nije uopste realno.
Iskreno svaki svoj zavrseni hit odkako ima opcija retrospektive sam pogledao da vidim gdje grijesim i da li grijesim i gdje drugi grijese i da li rade isto kao ja sto je sasvim logicno

danas ni quid ne može do kraja

Update: Job Retrospectives 2016-12-14 19:37:29 UTC, Kristen Hohenstein
Hello everyone,
We’ve changed something about job retrospectives. You’ll now only receive a retrospective if you answered Yes, but 2 other people in your job group answered No. In addition to this, you will only be able to view job groups you received a retrospective email for.
This change is being made because we saw retrospectives being used in ways that weren’t constructive. People were using the links to look at any job group they’ve ever participated in, even if they didn’t receive a retrospective for it. This created a hunt for “yes workers” to report to Rainforest admin in the forum. While the desire to help Rainforest admin root out cheaters is noble in principle, the way it was happening created a lot of division and tension in the forums. People were being accused of being yes workers when in fact some weren’t, and they were often belittled for making honest mistakes. This isn’t constructive. In addition to this, retrospectives in their current state are only meant to be a learning tool — there is no efficient way for us to manually look into every person accused of being a yes worker in the forum threads dedicated to his topic.
Moving forward, continue to refrain from posting about job retrospectives in the forum. The topic will be flagged and deleted. However, not all is lost! We are brainstorming ways to enable testers to review other testers’ work and flag suspicious results. Whatever solution we come up with will respect the privacy of all testers involved and enable us to efficiently gather and act on the suspicious test results that you flag.
As always, thank you all for being awesome!