ySense Customer Care Corner

#1 by tasman1 » Fri Apr 08, 2016 23:55

Women are traditionally the carers, the collaborators, the peacemakers, the givers, the communicators. Such feminine skills and qualities are precisely the strengths we all need today to face the global challenges of the future: the environment, globalization, preventative and ongoing health care, and feeding an increasing population.
I can’t wait to hear about what you think about this post. Do you see it this way?

#2 by Taipei101 » Fri Apr 08, 2016 23:59

Ha ha ha..You do already, especially in the courts, I disagree, Gillard stuffed up this country, now look what Merkel has done. Hope Hillary doesn't become president.

#3 by tasman1 » Sat Apr 09, 2016 00:02

The last century was the bloodiest in human history, and so far, this one has been a tale of war, terrorism, religious extremism, abject poverty, and disease. I’m not saying it’s all men’s fault. But let’s just say, they’ve been in charge, and it doesn’t seem we’re much closer to finding answers to these profound and vexing problems.

#4 by tasman1 » Sat Apr 09, 2016 00:07

Taipei101 wrote: Ha ha ha..You do already, especially in the courts, I disagree, Gillard stuffed up this country, now look what Merkel has done. Hope Hillary doesn't become president.

Are You sure Juliar was a women

#5 by valerie » Sat Apr 09, 2016 08:27

Naw, just another imaginary way of thinking.

In other words, there are women just as ruthless and conniving as men.

There are very kind and caring men and same goes for women BUT the
opposite is true too.

#6 by jjohnson777 » Sat Apr 09, 2016 09:39

UK was lead by iron lady when South American country took British territory they thought they do nothing. She sent entire British fleet to take it back. After all British lives lost safe bet as long they want to be British they keep spending $200 million a year to defend them. Even USA did not want to back UK until South American country was unreasonable with American diplomats.

Ladies do not forgiven and forget you get on there bad side and you made enemy for life.

#7 by Charez » Sat Apr 09, 2016 10:25

When a woman is not happy, she knows how to tell you and make you feel the pain :lol:

#8 by Taipei101 » Sat Apr 09, 2016 10:48

Just think where this all stems from if you're religious.

#9 by tasman1 » Sat Apr 09, 2016 15:06

If women ruled the world, politics would be more collegial, businesses would be more productive, and communities would be healthier. More women should lead—not because they are the same as men, but precisely because they are different. .............................For me . it will be ok if few women take me to be their slave [ or pet ] , will not complain

#10 by proadco » Sat Apr 09, 2016 15:17

You Certainly Do Not Want Hillary To Be President To Rule The World

Do you realize how many thousands of people have died
because of the Clinton's when they were President and First Lady.

For example: Google the backstory on: 78 days of bombing of the Christian Serbs and the reason why.

#11 by Nikorj » Sat Apr 09, 2016 16:00

Let the women rule nooooooo

I can't afford a tax of 70%

All these strong world leaders have wifes too you know,Yeah it might seem like they're making all the important decisions on the outside,But it's all decided by their wifes by breakfast :mrgreen:

#12 by Fellow » Sun Apr 10, 2016 06:57

charez wrote: When a woman is not happy, she knows how to tell you and make you feel the pain

Bang on the head :mrgreen:

#13 by garhod66 » Sun Apr 10, 2016 07:16

THINK:
Man wakes up, quick wash and goes to work and deals with everything the day brings!!
Woman wakes up, spends hours getting ready, goes to work and gets stressed out by every little thing!!

Results:
Man may come across as an uncaring idiot, but at least he gets things done!!
Woman on the other hand may come across as intelligent and thoughtful but needs twice or three times as long to do the same thing!!

What would you rather prefer in a leader.... Boris Johnson (bungling fool of London Mayor) or Margaret Thatcher (ex Prime Minister of UK)?

#14 by tasman1 » Sun Apr 10, 2016 15:19

the topic is not about women leader but, Matriarchal societtes , total womens rules

#15 by tasman1 » Sun Apr 10, 2016 15:26

one good example ...

THE MOSUO, CHINA
Deep in south-west China lies Lugu Lake, a place known as the Kingdom of Women. Here you’ll find the 40,000-strong Mosuo, one of the world’s last matrilineal societies. As befits a culture with no word for ‘father’ or ‘husband’, Mosuo women do not marry. Instead, they take as many lovers as they wish, cherry-picking them from within the tribe and inviting them for secret evening trysts (usually after the men have spent all day slaughtering pigs, while females sort out household finances). Property is handed down through the female line and there’s no stigma in not knowing who a child’s father is.

#16 by Nikorj » Sun Apr 10, 2016 15:52

errr no thanks Tasman1

Men as breeding machines,I'll rather live in a society with equal rights for both genders.

#17 by sweetpie3000 » Sun Apr 10, 2016 19:48

Woman are smarter than man now. Time has change.

#18 by Charez » Mon Apr 11, 2016 08:20

davidbugs wrote: Woman are smarter than man now. Time has change.

Oh really ? women were retard before ? :thumbdown:

#19 by janiss72 » Tue Apr 12, 2016 09:43

angela merkel is the boss in europe :evil:

I do not want that kind of woman

#20 by Charez » Tue Apr 12, 2016 10:44

Yeah, let's vote for janiss to rule Europe

Member Since	5 May 2012
Last Visit	Today
Likes Given	17,692
Likes Received	18,676/9,910

Member Since	8 Mar 2014
Last Visit	21 Jul 2017
Likes Given	49
Likes Received	14/9

Member Since	5 May 2012
Last Visit	Today
Likes Given	17,692
Likes Received	18,676/9,910

Member Since	5 May 2012
Last Visit	Today
Likes Given	17,692
Likes Received	18,676/9,910

Member Since	27 Feb 2007
Last Visit	20 Apr 2024
Likes Given	5,904
Likes Received	20,354/8,817