FYI: I don't have to include myself cause there is not one to be seen.

@Sarah_Hill

Very well said, but your comments won't make one iota of difference. Rod's ProAdCo's long-time modus operandi has been to cause as many arguments as possible because it gets him more attention.

Posting controversial stuff IS his marketing strategy. He has boasted about it here & in other forums (several of which he has since been banned from). He believes that any publicity is good publicity. The more disharmony he can cause, the happier he is. It raises his brand awareness.

He is not a good person to disagree with, as you would have seen from his abusive posts in these forums.

The more often you argue with him, the more often he will post an abusive or nonsensical reply, because it means that there is another post on the Internet with the name "ProAdCo" attached to it.

That is also why Rod ProAdCo always has to have to have the last word. To make sure he gets another post on the board for the search engines, and to keep the topic alive. The more people he pisses off here, the happier he is. because it means his marketing strategy is working.

cookin2 wrote:

ProAdCo wrote: Charez, it's you and your clan that roams around posting negative comments on the reputation, matter of fact, I'm going to start a new thread and start posting the members that make negative reviews.

In threads, it's open game.

For those who make twisted negative comments on people's reputation is like you trying to get the last word in.

Not like, that anyone has posted their IQ level.

When you start that new thread, please be sure to include yourself.

I saw you give davidbugs a -1, then change it to neutral, and now there is nothing.

I saw you give seaeagle a -1 and I see that you've removed that as well.

There may be other examples of this kind of behavior, but I can only post about what I've seen myself.

Well spotted. So Rod ProAdCo deletes all of his negative reviews of other members, and then immediately adopts a policy of threatening to "OUT" anyone who dares to post a negative review of him.

Hey Rod ProAdCo! Could I please have my -1 back? I don't want other members to form any misguided belief that I am the epitome of perfection

@ seaeagle

cookin2 wrote: Sarah, I have nothing to add, you said it well Thank you, my friend!

One thing - please edit out sh*t or someone will report you and you could get a warning

You're most welcome, dear!

Thanks for pointing that out... to be honest though, I wrote the entire word on purpose, as I've seen some minor potentially offensive words used around the forum lately (even by a moderator) and not being edited. I thought this usage is maybe allowed from time to time and depending on the purpose.

Davidbugs didn't just post what was in the news. He mistakenly reported what was in the news and then added, "warn your kids" in the title Yes, warn your kids that they are going to see two women who may or not be gay and that the cartoon or Disney, it's not clear which or either, are pushing the gay agenda, whatever that may be. That is not posting what is in the news.

ProAdCo wrote:

What about that " lesbian relationship appearing in a cartoon movie "

You all totally went off on Davidbugs because he posted it. Then you turn around and bashed him.

The problem with you guys. You bring your personal life to work on the internet.

What I post and what Davidbugs posted is in the news

Then you go off on the deep in and start flaming the posters. SMH

You all..., excuse me? I didn't even write on that thread.

As cookin2 has already stated, davidbugs didn't just "post what's in the news". He gave his opinion, and cookin2 gave her opinion about davidbug's. Besides, you both must be well aware that the type of threads you usually post will probably trigger a lot of controversy, and because this is a public forum, you both expose yourselves to other people's views on what you post and how you do it... as long as everyone abides by the rules on their comments.

Anyway, I guess davidbugs has a tongue of his own (or some fingers, in this case), and he hasn't even said if he felt somehow offended, so this discussion is totally pointless.

Have a nice day!

Quote:#48 by Sarah_Hill

You all..., excuse me? I didn't even write on that thread.

As cookin2 has already stated, davidbugs didn't just "post what's in the news". He gave his opinion, and cookin2 gave her opinion about davidbug's. Besides, you both must be well aware that the type of threads you usually post will probably trigger a lot of controversy, and because this is a public forum, you both expose yourselves to other people's views on what you post and how you do it... as long as everyone abides by the rules on their comments.

Anyway, I guess davidbugs has a tongue of his own (or some fingers, in this case), and he hasn't even said if he felt somehow offended, so this discussion is totally pointless.

Have a nice day!

SMH. Don't You All Me.

You can, you all them - the goofy gang troll all you want.

As for davidbugs, he doesn't care what you say, You All Take Bait

You guys just too easy to have your string pull like a puppet to wind you up

@ ProAdCo

Speaking of something else , now we end off topic thread again ...

Have you sorted out your website ??

If so , then i am curious to watch it , please send your link to my e -mail , maybe i buy something.

@ Zegon

Not finished, but when it is, I'll send you an email

I am tired and I have a headache and I am sick of looking at this junk.