jjohnson777 wrote: Valerie is a good moderator. I will agree Marcel is lock happy but who cares. Much to do about nothing. Want to see bad moderator ask them to make me one you be singing Valerie and Marcel praises after few weeks of me.

Just one small correction,I'm not "Lock Happy" as you call it,I simply follow the forum rules.

The ones who are complaining are the ones who create pointless and nonsense topics....ergo those get locked.

But like the old saying goes "you can't please everyone "

This is what a much, much smaller and shittier site says about how they were able to keep PayPal for their valuable members.

"Paypal has issues with the way we are announcing our business, which means we can no longer announce ourselves as a revenue sharing network. We have to explicitly write that we are not a multi level marketing or get rich quick money scheme and have to repeat this in our FAQ.

_Besides that we have to accept some extra security measures which are related to fees, chargebacks, disputes on PayPal itself. _

And last but not least, they require us to run our site under the https:// protocol, which is in any case fair and will result in more security for you, but might take the most time to set up."

Oh for heaven sakes!

I mean I sure won't attest to PayPal telling truths or lies because I don't know.

However, I do have enough common sense to know that was PayPal customer support person or persons
replying to the inquisition. I would fathom that the news is not in the direct fan yet. Also, it could be
PayPal is still looking at resolving an issue or a number of things.

Why in the world wouldn't you believe the owner of ClixSense? So very absurd. Of course CS will
continue to utilize PayPal if possible but he said it was not and he also said PayPal would not be back.
So I strongly suggest unless you hear otherwise from Jim, owner of ClixSense, you focus on another
payment option.

Enough already,your comment is totally unnecessary and insulting