There are rules for members
but no rule for Routers
I suggest the following rules should be implemented

1--Screenout time should be fixed: Screenout time should be not more than 5 minutes after that screenout should be with a genuine reason & member should know the reason for his/her fault

2--Payment in time: Few Routers are not crediting after one month or more, it should be fixed time to credit

I feel fulfilling this will increase in trust either side & will be beneficial for this trade

ClixSense does not own survey companies.

You forget to say

There are rules for people
but no rule for King

Hi man , did you forgot that we are just people , who care

Hii friend Tasman 1,

We are living in a democratic world
Monarchy days have gone

Do agree to you, my friend Valerie,

Clixsense can make an agreement with the router to allow them to get business here which they have not done in past. Clixsense will not be in favour to keep harmful features which will affect their business

thanks for your comment

The only place that can make rules for routers are the actual companies that provide the platform for publishers and advertisers, unfortunately, many companies work on a "PROFIT ONLY" business model, such as Figure Eight, where basically their task authors have free will to do anything, including lowering people's accuracy unfairly, not fixing test questions, running deceptive tasks (like the adfly / bitly guy getting free traffic with his deceptive task) etc. though each platform does have their own internal rules, but when it comes to rules towards actual task contributors or survey respondents they are nil, basically publishers can reverse surveys for ANY reason and they do not have to justify the reasons too. The only thing CS can do about it is forward our complaints, but I guess most of the time these complaints might fall on deaf ears, one of the companies CS deals with has made over 300+ million profits last financial year, so do they care, nope, as people still continue to provide data, leads, survey, complete offers and tasks and shareholders are happy, that's all that matters to company - In my opinion, ClixSense has our best interest, but there is very little they can do.

According to publishers, they say "We get cheated too by survey respondents", but there is a problem, they are DELUSIONAL into thinking they can expect the same quality and honesty when they continually lower the pay rate. When you see some once $1 offers down to 30 cents, would it be reasonable for them to expect the SAME quality ?
They should not punish the whole crowd for some cheaters though.

Thanks, Darkstar2

for the reply to my post

as well as deeply analysed the whole situation & tried to represent the feelings of the members

thanks again

Regards