My ClixGrid Stats
Chances (Left/Total) 0 60
Clicks (Today/Total) 60 49,860
Winnings (Today/Total) $0.00 $14.20

So four clixgrid clicks are worth roughly the same as (a bit more than) one micro ad.

Overreact much?

It's a bonus, not an entitlement. It's also Sunday. You're talking less than 10 cents.

Take a walk down the street, you'll probably be able to make it up finding a coin someone dropped.

(Four more != persistence)

Persistence is the key. You have to check all the routers, and the offerwalls - especially peanutlabs, personal.ly and offertoro - and you have to check them multiple times a day. Everyone screens out for lots of surveys. You'll eventually learn which to avoid - it may not be immediately obvious, but many of the surveys are regular (like the weekly survey from Game - it just changes which games it asks you about. The very regular GTM film surveys - it just changes which films it asks you about, Song People, which asks you which of that particular week's music you like, etc)

Once you've learned which ones to avoid, you spend much less time answering qualifiers.

In short, don't be put off by rejection. Everyone is rejected by most surveys, the trick is make that rejection quick.

Except weekends. Nobody makes real money at weekends.

Last one I watched was the Hobbit films. You might wonder how they managed to stretch out such a short book into three films. The explanation is you're missing the subtext.

See, before Radagast was Radagast, he was The Doctor. When he was The Doctor, he was Merlin. When he was Merlin, he discovered that in his personal future, when he was The Doctor again, he'd have to travel to the distant past to grow an organic space ship that would be so old by the time he discovered it that it had started to deteriorate.

The Hobbit is clearly The Doctor's future self, masquerading as Radagast in distant history, growing said spaceship so he could use it in his personal past in the future, in the most epic crossover of our time.

Knowing this made it much more watchable.

Bloody hell, went to bed on a Tory minority, woke up to a Tory landslide.

Welcome to hell gentlemen, welcome to hell.

On the plus side, Channel 4 has been fun.

I live by the moors. I care about ecology, conservation, hill walking, cardigans and flat caps. My ambition in life is to own a field and live in it (really - I'll even be running an ad here at Clixsense for it shortly). What do I have in common with a banker in London who cares about cars, gadgets, television programs and ISAs, who desires a penthouse suite at the Savoy?

How is it even possible to please both people with the same government? You can't.

And of course it dilutes power. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. The more of it you give to somebody, the more they'll stab you in the back with it. We don't want any individual with power, we want lots of people with equality.

The Scottish problem is that "Scotland" isn't a sensible division (and to be honest, neither is Yorkshire). It's way too big - it's not obvious someone in Glasgow has anything in common with someone in the remote highlands.

In the case of Yorkshire, the Vikings got it mostly right - the wapentakes still make up sensible divisions. In the rest of the UK, parliamentary constituencies need some work, but offer a reasonable start.

In fact, the Lib-Dems mostly offer this with their support for more devolution to local councils - it's just watered down a bit compared to what I would like.

Yorkshire First. Centralisation is bad. People should rule themselves. I'm not saying you have to be born in Yorkshire to have a say what happens in Yorkshire, but you should at least live there. Living with them is kinda the minimum requirement of having a say in anyone else's life.

Then when Yorkshire First gets in, we can break that down, until the Skyrack is restored to it's Jorvik glory local decisions are taken locally.

If the lib-dems and greens could get enough between them to control more than labour and the tories, that'd be a good result. Even if they don't form a government, just having enough of the vote between them to keep the other two relatively sane would make the world a safer place.

But as long as UKIP are kept out, that's the main thing.

Well, it is an activity bonus, not a give me money for no reason bonus.

Clixgrid views are already down on a couple of years ago. If you pushed the minimum down to ten, bad things would happen.

Is the camel famous? It might be that one from the Cadbury's Picnic ads in the 80s/90s.

I'm not a very visual person, and I don't like many artists. I like Escher. I like Nedko Solakov (who is the odd one out in this list). And now I like Oleg I. Shuplyak.

This is what Escher would paint if he started taking acid.

Who is/are the artist(s)?

One can add --always-authorize-plugins to the commandline flag/start up shortcut to get everything back.

[CheapPointScoring]Or you could just use Konqueror and delegate plugin support to the OS.[/CheapPointScoring]

Actually, you both missed my point.

I'm just saying don't trust $randomdude for security advice.

You shouldn't trust the AV manufacturers either. How do you know their code isn't malicious itself? The link earlier in the thread even says "We can't prove they stole our code, because it's a secret, and we can't let you check it's okay". That's insane.

AFAIK, there's only Clam that lets you look at the code - and I wouldn't recommend Clam unless you're a mail server.

And you can't just move to Linux, because we rely on SELinux, which came from the NSA. Oh, but FreeBSD ported it too.

So, there isn't an uncompromised defence in existence.

And you can't trust me either - I'm a backendyweb generalist, not a security expert...

All I'm saying is for something that sits between you and all your private conversations, and all your money, and increasingly all your interaction with business and government, do your own research, don't rely on one thread on a GPT site.

Quote:nothing beats AVAST free antivirus.

Except ten of the other twenty one antivirus packages that put themselves up for independent testing.

We live in a world where 90% of people type the name of a website into google because they haven't figured out what the address bar does yet...it doesn't seem likely many people will type in a full URL, including the query string. You probably want a domain - or at least a subdomain like clixsense.example.com - because they'll stop typing at the / This is why even TV adverts gave up and started saying things like "search 'army jobs'" instead of "army,mod.uk"

You probably want a QR code on there as well. You can make people do anything if it gives them an excuse to fondle their slab play with their phone.

Yes - but it's going to need a credit card and some of the higher paying trial offers.