grizzly4agze wrote:Quote:Yes, I feel you my friend. I do agreed with your statement up there. I too lose 00.1% last week over 96.1%, so I don't dare to do the job you mentioned above unless I could find a way to increase my global accuracies. This whole year seem very bad for me, my CF accuracies keeps decreasing from 96.7% until now 96.0%, and the worst part is that, it seems like there is no way we could increase that little 00.1%. The more we tries to do, the quicker our accuracies decrease.
CF's accuracy system is just broken beyond belief. Add that up with poor support and getting locked out from certain projects (jobs) due to the unfair testing process, it is just unbelievable. I'm honestly very amazed what the final product ends up being, either the clients have to send it to another company for audit (like mturk or lionbridge, and start a project like REVIEW: Identify Recommended Businesses), OR the quality control is just not a priority to them.
Above is my stats elsewhere, if you're under 95% global accuracy, you're no good. Some projects even demand almost 100% accuracy. Usually everywhere I'd worked at, there will usually be 1 project divided into 2: The initial data collecting process for lower accuracy workers, and the review process for the higher accuracy workers.
What site is that?